Information on Result #2240886
Linear OA(4151, 199, F4, 72) (dual of [199, 48, 73]-code), using 1 times truncation based on linear OA(4152, 200, F4, 73) (dual of [200, 48, 74]-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(4152, 200, F4, 74) (dual of [200, 48, 75]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6424, 40, F64, 24) (dual of [40, 16, 25]-code or 40-arc in PG(23,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6424, 64, F64, 24) (dual of [64, 40, 25]-code or 64-arc in PG(23,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(40,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6424, 64, F64, 24) (dual of [64, 40, 25]-code or 64-arc in PG(23,64)), using
- linear OA(42, 5, F4, 2) (dual of [5, 3, 3]-code or 5-arc in PG(1,4)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(3,4) [i]
- Hamming code H(2,4) [i]
- linear OA(6424, 40, F64, 24) (dual of [40, 16, 25]-code or 40-arc in PG(23,64)), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.