Information on Result #2240969
Linear OA(4161, 203, F4, 81) (dual of [203, 42, 82]-code), using 2 times truncation based on linear OA(4163, 205, F4, 83) (dual of [205, 42, 84]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6427, 41, F64, 27) (dual of [41, 14, 28]-code or 41-arc in PG(26,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6427, 64, F64, 27) (dual of [64, 37, 28]-code or 64-arc in PG(26,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(37,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6427, 64, F64, 27) (dual of [64, 37, 28]-code or 64-arc in PG(26,64)), using
- linear OA(42, 5, F4, 2) (dual of [5, 3, 3]-code or 5-arc in PG(1,4)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(3,4) [i]
- Hamming code H(2,4) [i]
- linear OA(6427, 41, F64, 27) (dual of [41, 14, 28]-code or 41-arc in PG(26,64)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.