MinT - Information on Result #2241228

Information on Result #2241228

Linear OA(4¹⁷¹, 213, F₄, 88) (dual of [213, 42, 89]-code), using 3 times truncation based on linear OA(4¹⁷⁴, 216, F₄, 91) (dual of [216, 42, 92]-code), using

concatenation of two codes [i] based on
1. linear OA(64²², 36, F₆₄, 22) (dual of [36, 14, 23]-code or 36-arc in PG(21,64)), using
  - discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(64²², 64, F₆₄, 22) (dual of [64, 42, 23]-code or 64-arc in PG(21,64)), using
    - Reedâ€“Solomon code RS(42,64) [i]
2. linear OA(4³, 6, F₄, 3) (dual of [6, 3, 4]-code or 6-arc in PG(2,4) or 6-cap in PG(2,4)), using
  - hyperoval in PG(2,Â 4) [i]
  - the Hexacode [i]

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

	Result		This result only	Method
1	Linear OOA(4¹⁷¹, 106, F₄, 2, 88) (dual of [(106, 2), 41, 89]-NRT-code)	[i]		OOA Folding
2	Linear OOA(4¹⁷¹, 71, F₄, 3, 88) (dual of [(71, 3), 42, 89]-NRT-code)	[i]		OOA Folding