Information on Result #2241395
Linear OA(4163, 214, F4, 78) (dual of [214, 51, 79]-code), using 1 times truncation based on linear OA(4164, 215, F4, 79) (dual of [215, 51, 80]-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(4164, 215, F4, 80) (dual of [215, 51, 81]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6426, 43, F64, 26) (dual of [43, 17, 27]-code or 43-arc in PG(25,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6426, 64, F64, 26) (dual of [64, 38, 27]-code or 64-arc in PG(25,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(38,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6426, 64, F64, 26) (dual of [64, 38, 27]-code or 64-arc in PG(25,64)), using
- linear OA(42, 5, F4, 2) (dual of [5, 3, 3]-code or 5-arc in PG(1,4)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(3,4) [i]
- Hamming code H(2,4) [i]
- linear OA(6426, 43, F64, 26) (dual of [43, 17, 27]-code or 43-arc in PG(25,64)), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OOA(4163, 107, F4, 2, 78) (dual of [(107, 2), 51, 79]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |