Information on Result #2241609
Linear OA(4197, 233, F4, 109) (dual of [233, 36, 110]-code), using 1 times truncation based on linear OA(4198, 234, F4, 110) (dual of [234, 36, 111]-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(4198, 234, F4, 111) (dual of [234, 36, 112]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6427, 39, F64, 27) (dual of [39, 12, 28]-code or 39-arc in PG(26,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6427, 64, F64, 27) (dual of [64, 37, 28]-code or 64-arc in PG(26,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(37,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6427, 64, F64, 27) (dual of [64, 37, 28]-code or 64-arc in PG(26,64)), using
- linear OA(43, 6, F4, 3) (dual of [6, 3, 4]-code or 6-arc in PG(2,4) or 6-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- linear OA(6427, 39, F64, 27) (dual of [39, 12, 28]-code or 39-arc in PG(26,64)), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.