Information on Result #2241755
Linear OA(4191, 233, F4, 101) (dual of [233, 42, 102]-code), using 1 times truncation based on linear OA(4192, 234, F4, 102) (dual of [234, 42, 103]-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(4192, 234, F4, 103) (dual of [234, 42, 104]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6425, 39, F64, 25) (dual of [39, 14, 26]-code or 39-arc in PG(24,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6425, 64, F64, 25) (dual of [64, 39, 26]-code or 64-arc in PG(24,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(39,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6425, 64, F64, 25) (dual of [64, 39, 26]-code or 64-arc in PG(24,64)), using
- linear OA(43, 6, F4, 3) (dual of [6, 3, 4]-code or 6-arc in PG(2,4) or 6-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- linear OA(6425, 39, F64, 25) (dual of [39, 14, 26]-code or 39-arc in PG(24,64)), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.