Information on Result #2241976
Linear OA(4206, 245, F4, 113) (dual of [245, 39, 114]-code), using 1 times truncation based on linear OA(4207, 246, F4, 114) (dual of [246, 39, 115]-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(4207, 246, F4, 115) (dual of [246, 39, 116]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6428, 41, F64, 28) (dual of [41, 13, 29]-code or 41-arc in PG(27,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6428, 64, F64, 28) (dual of [64, 36, 29]-code or 64-arc in PG(27,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(36,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6428, 64, F64, 28) (dual of [64, 36, 29]-code or 64-arc in PG(27,64)), using
- linear OA(43, 6, F4, 3) (dual of [6, 3, 4]-code or 6-arc in PG(2,4) or 6-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- linear OA(6428, 41, F64, 28) (dual of [41, 13, 29]-code or 41-arc in PG(27,64)), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.