Information on Result #2243234
Linear OA(4199, 289, F4, 84) (dual of [289, 90, 85]-code), using 1 times truncation based on linear OA(4200, 290, F4, 85) (dual of [290, 90, 86]-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(4200, 290, F4, 86) (dual of [290, 90, 87]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6428, 58, F64, 28) (dual of [58, 30, 29]-code or 58-arc in PG(27,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6428, 64, F64, 28) (dual of [64, 36, 29]-code or 64-arc in PG(27,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(36,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6428, 64, F64, 28) (dual of [64, 36, 29]-code or 64-arc in PG(27,64)), using
- linear OA(42, 5, F4, 2) (dual of [5, 3, 3]-code or 5-arc in PG(1,4)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(3,4) [i]
- Hamming code H(2,4) [i]
- linear OA(6428, 58, F64, 28) (dual of [58, 30, 29]-code or 58-arc in PG(27,64)), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.