Information on Result #2245560
Linear OA(569, 81, F5, 44) (dual of [81, 12, 45]-code), using 3 times truncation based on linear OA(572, 84, F5, 47) (dual of [84, 12, 48]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(2515, 21, F25, 15) (dual of [21, 6, 16]-code or 21-arc in PG(14,25)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2515, 25, F25, 15) (dual of [25, 10, 16]-code or 25-arc in PG(14,25)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(10,25) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2515, 25, F25, 15) (dual of [25, 10, 16]-code or 25-arc in PG(14,25)), using
- linear OA(52, 4, F5, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,5)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(52, 5, F5, 2) (dual of [5, 3, 3]-code or 5-arc in PG(1,5)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(3,5) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(52, 5, F5, 2) (dual of [5, 3, 3]-code or 5-arc in PG(1,5)), using
- linear OA(2515, 21, F25, 15) (dual of [21, 6, 16]-code or 21-arc in PG(14,25)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.