Information on Result #2245688
Linear OA(581, 91, F5, 54) (dual of [91, 10, 55]-code), using 9 times truncation based on linear OA(590, 100, F5, 63) (dual of [100, 10, 64]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(2515, 20, F25, 15) (dual of [20, 5, 16]-code or 20-arc in PG(14,25)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2515, 25, F25, 15) (dual of [25, 10, 16]-code or 25-arc in PG(14,25)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(10,25) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2515, 25, F25, 15) (dual of [25, 10, 16]-code or 25-arc in PG(14,25)), using
- linear OA(53, 5, F5, 3) (dual of [5, 2, 4]-code or 5-arc in PG(2,5) or 5-cap in PG(2,5)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(2,5) [i]
- linear OA(2515, 20, F25, 15) (dual of [20, 5, 16]-code or 20-arc in PG(14,25)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.