Information on Result #2246130
Linear OA(597, 111, F5, 63) (dual of [111, 14, 64]-code), using 4 times truncation based on linear OA(5101, 115, F5, 67) (dual of [115, 14, 68]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(2516, 23, F25, 16) (dual of [23, 7, 17]-code or 23-arc in PG(15,25)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2516, 25, F25, 16) (dual of [25, 9, 17]-code or 25-arc in PG(15,25)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(9,25) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2516, 25, F25, 16) (dual of [25, 9, 17]-code or 25-arc in PG(15,25)), using
- linear OA(53, 5, F5, 3) (dual of [5, 2, 4]-code or 5-arc in PG(2,5) or 5-cap in PG(2,5)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(2,5) [i]
- linear OA(2516, 23, F25, 16) (dual of [23, 7, 17]-code or 23-arc in PG(15,25)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.