Information on Result #2246921
Linear OA(5144, 162, F5, 88) (dual of [162, 18, 89]-code), using 6 times truncation based on linear OA(5150, 168, F5, 94) (dual of [168, 18, 95]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(2519, 28, F25, 18) (dual of [28, 9, 19]-code), using
- construction X applied to RS(7,25) ⊂ RS(9,25) [i] based on
- linear OA(2518, 25, F25, 18) (dual of [25, 7, 19]-code or 25-arc in PG(17,25)), using Reed–Solomon code RS(7,25) [i]
- linear OA(2516, 25, F25, 16) (dual of [25, 9, 17]-code or 25-arc in PG(15,25)), using Reed–Solomon code RS(9,25) [i]
- linear OA(251, 3, F25, 1) (dual of [3, 2, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(251, s, F25, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to RS(7,25) ⊂ RS(9,25) [i] based on
- linear OA(54, 6, F5, 4) (dual of [6, 2, 5]-code or 6-arc in PG(3,5)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(2,5) [i]
- Simplex code S(2,5) [i]
- linear OA(2519, 28, F25, 18) (dual of [28, 9, 19]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.