Information on Result #2248249
Linear OA(785, 101, F7, 53) (dual of [101, 16, 54]-code), using 3 times truncation based on linear OA(788, 104, F7, 56) (dual of [104, 16, 57]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(4918, 26, F49, 18) (dual of [26, 8, 19]-code or 26-arc in PG(17,49)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4918, 49, F49, 18) (dual of [49, 31, 19]-code or 49-arc in PG(17,49)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(31,49) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4918, 49, F49, 18) (dual of [49, 31, 19]-code or 49-arc in PG(17,49)), using
- linear OA(72, 4, F7, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,7)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(72, 7, F7, 2) (dual of [7, 5, 3]-code or 7-arc in PG(1,7)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(5,7) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(72, 7, F7, 2) (dual of [7, 5, 3]-code or 7-arc in PG(1,7)), using
- linear OA(4918, 26, F49, 18) (dual of [26, 8, 19]-code or 26-arc in PG(17,49)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.