Information on Result #2252680
Linear OA(984, 93, F9, 65) (dual of [93, 9, 66]-code), using 6 times truncation based on linear OA(990, 99, F9, 71) (dual of [99, 9, 72]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(70) ⊂ Ce(59) [i] based on
- linear OA(978, 81, F9, 71) (dual of [81, 3, 72]-code), using an extension Ce(70) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,70], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 71 [i]
- linear OA(972, 81, F9, 60) (dual of [81, 9, 61]-code), using an extension Ce(59) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,59], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 60 [i]
- linear OA(912, 18, F9, 10) (dual of [18, 6, 11]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(912, 20, F9, 10) (dual of [20, 8, 11]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,9P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 20, using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(912, 20, F9, 10) (dual of [20, 8, 11]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.