Information on Result #2252835
Linear OA(979, 95, F9, 57) (dual of [95, 16, 58]-code), using 3 times truncation based on linear OA(982, 98, F9, 60) (dual of [98, 16, 61]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(59) ⊂ Ce(49) [i] based on
- linear OA(972, 81, F9, 60) (dual of [81, 9, 61]-code), using an extension Ce(59) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,59], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 60 [i]
- linear OA(965, 81, F9, 50) (dual of [81, 16, 51]-code), using an extension Ce(49) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,49], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 50 [i]
- linear OA(910, 17, F9, 9) (dual of [17, 7, 10]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(910, 20, F9, 9) (dual of [20, 10, 10]-code), using
- extended quadratic residue code Qe(20,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(910, 20, F9, 9) (dual of [20, 10, 10]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OA(982, 99, F9, 57) (dual of [99, 17, 58]-code) | [i] | Construction X with Varšamov Bound | |
| 2 | Linear OOA(979, 47, F9, 2, 57) (dual of [(47, 2), 15, 58]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |