Information on Result #2253305
Linear OA(9117, 129, F9, 81) (dual of [129, 12, 82]-code), using 6 times truncation based on linear OA(9123, 135, F9, 87) (dual of [135, 12, 88]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(8121, 27, F81, 21) (dual of [27, 6, 22]-code or 27-arc in PG(20,81)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8121, 81, F81, 21) (dual of [81, 60, 22]-code or 81-arc in PG(20,81)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(60,81) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8121, 81, F81, 21) (dual of [81, 60, 22]-code or 81-arc in PG(20,81)), using
- linear OA(93, 5, F9, 3) (dual of [5, 2, 4]-code or 5-arc in PG(2,9) or 5-cap in PG(2,9)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(93, 9, F9, 3) (dual of [9, 6, 4]-code or 9-arc in PG(2,9) or 9-cap in PG(2,9)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(6,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(93, 9, F9, 3) (dual of [9, 6, 4]-code or 9-arc in PG(2,9) or 9-cap in PG(2,9)), using
- linear OA(8121, 27, F81, 21) (dual of [27, 6, 22]-code or 27-arc in PG(20,81)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.