Information on Result #2253400
Linear OA(9135, 147, F9, 95) (dual of [147, 12, 96]-code), using 9 times truncation based on linear OA(9144, 156, F9, 104) (dual of [156, 12, 105]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(8120, 26, F81, 20) (dual of [26, 6, 21]-code or 26-arc in PG(19,81)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8120, 81, F81, 20) (dual of [81, 61, 21]-code or 81-arc in PG(19,81)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(61,81) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8120, 81, F81, 20) (dual of [81, 61, 21]-code or 81-arc in PG(19,81)), using
- linear OA(94, 6, F9, 4) (dual of [6, 2, 5]-code or 6-arc in PG(3,9)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(94, 9, F9, 4) (dual of [9, 5, 5]-code or 9-arc in PG(3,9)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(5,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(94, 9, F9, 4) (dual of [9, 5, 5]-code or 9-arc in PG(3,9)), using
- linear OA(8120, 26, F81, 20) (dual of [26, 6, 21]-code or 26-arc in PG(19,81)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.