Information on Result #2253452
Linear OA(999, 125, F9, 58) (dual of [125, 26, 59]-code), using 1 times truncation based on linear OA(9100, 126, F9, 59) (dual of [126, 26, 60]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(8129, 42, F81, 29) (dual of [42, 13, 30]-code or 42-arc in PG(28,81)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8129, 81, F81, 29) (dual of [81, 52, 30]-code or 81-arc in PG(28,81)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(52,81) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8129, 81, F81, 29) (dual of [81, 52, 30]-code or 81-arc in PG(28,81)), using
- linear OA(91, 3, F9, 1) (dual of [3, 2, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(91, s, F9, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(8129, 42, F81, 29) (dual of [42, 13, 30]-code or 42-arc in PG(28,81)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.