Information on Result #2253810
Linear OA(9133, 161, F9, 80) (dual of [161, 28, 81]-code), using 3 times truncation based on linear OA(9136, 164, F9, 83) (dual of [164, 28, 84]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(8127, 41, F81, 27) (dual of [41, 14, 28]-code or 41-arc in PG(26,81)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8127, 81, F81, 27) (dual of [81, 54, 28]-code or 81-arc in PG(26,81)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(54,81) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8127, 81, F81, 27) (dual of [81, 54, 28]-code or 81-arc in PG(26,81)), using
- linear OA(92, 4, F9, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,9)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(92, 9, F9, 2) (dual of [9, 7, 3]-code or 9-arc in PG(1,9)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(7,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(92, 9, F9, 2) (dual of [9, 7, 3]-code or 9-arc in PG(1,9)), using
- linear OA(8127, 41, F81, 27) (dual of [41, 14, 28]-code or 41-arc in PG(26,81)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.