Information on Result #2254390
Linear OA(1691, 94, F16, 83) (dual of [94, 3, 84]-code), using 39 times truncation based on linear OA(16130, 133, F16, 122) (dual of [133, 3, 123]-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OA(1610, 13, F16, 10) (dual of [13, 3, 11]-code or 13-arc in PG(9,16)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(1610, 16, F16, 10) (dual of [16, 6, 11]-code or 16-arc in PG(9,16)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(6,16) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(1610, 16, F16, 10) (dual of [16, 6, 11]-code or 16-arc in PG(9,16)), using
- linear OA(16117, 120, F16, 111) (dual of [120, 3, 112]-code), using
- Denniston code D(3,16) [i]
- linear OA(1610, 13, F16, 10) (dual of [13, 3, 11]-code or 13-arc in PG(9,16)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.