Information on Result #2268104
Linear OA(3166, 193, F3, 79) (dual of [193, 27, 80]-code), using 1 times code embedding in larger space based on linear OA(3165, 192, F3, 79) (dual of [192, 27, 80]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(2715, 24, F27, 15) (dual of [24, 9, 16]-code or 24-arc in PG(14,27)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2715, 27, F27, 15) (dual of [27, 12, 16]-code or 27-arc in PG(14,27)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(12,27) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2715, 27, F27, 15) (dual of [27, 12, 16]-code or 27-arc in PG(14,27)), using
- linear OA(35, 8, F3, 4) (dual of [8, 3, 5]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(35, 11, F3, 4) (dual of [11, 6, 5]-code), using
- Golay code G(3) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(35, 11, F3, 4) (dual of [11, 6, 5]-code), using
- linear OA(2715, 24, F27, 15) (dual of [24, 9, 16]-code or 24-arc in PG(14,27)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.