Information on Result #2447109
Linear OOA(582, 43, F5, 2, 67) (dual of [(43, 2), 4, 68]-NRT-code), using strength reduction based on linear OOA(582, 43, F5, 2, 68) (dual of [(43, 2), 4, 69]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(518, 11, F5, 2, 16) (dual of [(11, 2), 4, 17]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(518, 12, F5, 2, 16) (dual of [(12, 2), 6, 17]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,7P) [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 12, using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(518, 12, F5, 2, 16) (dual of [(12, 2), 6, 17]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(560, 32, F5, 2, 51) (dual of [(32, 2), 4, 52]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 2 times [i] based on linear OOA(528, 16, F5, 2, 25) (dual of [(16, 2), 4, 26]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,6P) [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 16, using
- repeating each code word 2 times [i] based on linear OOA(528, 16, F5, 2, 25) (dual of [(16, 2), 4, 26]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(518, 11, F5, 2, 16) (dual of [(11, 2), 4, 17]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.