Information on Result #2457409
Linear OOA(2122, 69, F2, 2, 61) (dual of [(69, 2), 16, 62]-NRT-code), using 2 step truncation based on linear OOA(2124, 70, F2, 2, 63) (dual of [(70, 2), 16, 64]-NRT-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OOA(2124, 70, F2, 2, 65) (dual of [(70, 2), 16, 66]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(1610, 14, F16, 10) (dual of [14, 4, 11]-code or 14-arc in PG(9,16)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(1610, 16, F16, 10) (dual of [16, 6, 11]-code or 16-arc in PG(9,16)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(6,16) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(1610, 16, F16, 10) (dual of [16, 6, 11]-code or 16-arc in PG(9,16)), using
- linear OOA(26, 5, F2, 2, 5) (dual of [(5, 2), 4, 6]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,4P) [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- linear OA(1610, 14, F16, 10) (dual of [14, 4, 11]-code or 14-arc in PG(9,16)), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.