Information on Result #2465058
Linear OOA(3157, 89, F3, 2, 94) (dual of [(89, 2), 21, 95]-NRT-code), using 6 step truncation based on linear OOA(3163, 92, F3, 2, 100) (dual of [(92, 2), 21, 101]-NRT-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OOA(3163, 92, F3, 2, 101) (dual of [(92, 2), 21, 102]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(2716, 23, F27, 16) (dual of [23, 7, 17]-code or 23-arc in PG(15,27)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2716, 27, F27, 16) (dual of [27, 11, 17]-code or 27-arc in PG(15,27)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(11,27) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2716, 27, F27, 16) (dual of [27, 11, 17]-code or 27-arc in PG(15,27)), using
- linear OOA(35, 4, F3, 2, 5) (dual of [(4, 2), 3, 6]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;3,3) [i]
- linear OA(2716, 23, F27, 16) (dual of [23, 7, 17]-code or 23-arc in PG(15,27)), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.