Information on Result #2468888
Linear OOA(4134, 69, F4, 2, 108) (dual of [(69, 2), 4, 109]-NRT-code), using 42 step truncation based on linear OOA(4176, 90, F4, 2, 150) (dual of [(90, 2), 4, 151]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(46, 5, F4, 2, 6) (dual of [(5, 2), 4, 7]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;4,4) [i]
- linear OOA(4166, 85, F4, 2, 143) (dual of [(85, 2), 4, 144]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(1615, 17, F16, 15) (dual of [17, 2, 16]-code or 17-arc in PG(14,16)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(2,16) [i]
- Simplex code S(2,16) [i]
- linear OOA(48, 5, F4, 2, 8) (dual of [(5, 2), 2, 9]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;2,4) [i]
- linear OA(1615, 17, F16, 15) (dual of [17, 2, 16]-code or 17-arc in PG(14,16)), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OOA(46, 5, F4, 2, 6) (dual of [(5, 2), 4, 7]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.