Information on Result #2470495
Linear OOA(4193, 101, F4, 2, 142) (dual of [(101, 2), 9, 143]-NRT-code), using 8 step truncation based on linear OOA(4201, 105, F4, 2, 150) (dual of [(105, 2), 9, 151]-NRT-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OOA(4201, 105, F4, 2, 151) (dual of [(105, 2), 9, 152]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6418, 21, F64, 18) (dual of [21, 3, 19]-code or 21-arc in PG(17,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6418, 64, F64, 18) (dual of [64, 46, 19]-code or 64-arc in PG(17,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(46,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6418, 64, F64, 18) (dual of [64, 46, 19]-code or 64-arc in PG(17,64)), using
- linear OOA(47, 5, F4, 2, 7) (dual of [(5, 2), 3, 8]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;3,4) [i]
- linear OA(6418, 21, F64, 18) (dual of [21, 3, 19]-code or 21-arc in PG(17,64)), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.