Information on Result #2471411
Linear OOA(4225, 118, F4, 2, 163) (dual of [(118, 2), 11, 164]-NRT-code), using 3 step truncation based on linear OOA(4228, 120, F4, 2, 166) (dual of [(120, 2), 12, 167]-NRT-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OOA(4228, 120, F4, 2, 167) (dual of [(120, 2), 12, 168]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6420, 24, F64, 20) (dual of [24, 4, 21]-code or 24-arc in PG(19,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6420, 64, F64, 20) (dual of [64, 44, 21]-code or 64-arc in PG(19,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(44,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6420, 64, F64, 20) (dual of [64, 44, 21]-code or 64-arc in PG(19,64)), using
- linear OOA(47, 5, F4, 2, 7) (dual of [(5, 2), 3, 8]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;3,4) [i]
- linear OA(6420, 24, F64, 20) (dual of [24, 4, 21]-code or 24-arc in PG(19,64)), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.