Information on Result #2476121
Linear OOA(9100, 51, F9, 2, 92) (dual of [(51, 2), 2, 93]-NRT-code), using 29 step truncation based on linear OOA(9129, 66, F9, 2, 121) (dual of [(66, 2), 3, 122]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(917, 10, F9, 2, 17) (dual of [(10, 2), 3, 18]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;3,9) [i]
- linear OOA(9109, 56, F9, 2, 103) (dual of [(56, 2), 3, 104]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 2 times [i] based on linear OOA(953, 28, F9, 2, 51) (dual of [(28, 2), 3, 52]-NRT-code), using
- standard lengthening with (d0,…,d1) = (50,51) [i] based on linear OOA(951, 27, F9, 2, 49) (dual of [(27, 2), 3, 50]-NRT-code), using algebraic-geometric NRT-code AG(2;F,4P) with known gap numbers [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using the Hermitian function field over F9 [i]
- repeating each code word 2 times [i] based on linear OOA(953, 28, F9, 2, 51) (dual of [(28, 2), 3, 52]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(917, 10, F9, 2, 17) (dual of [(10, 2), 3, 18]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.