Information on Result #2613039
Linear OOA(2147, 51, F2, 3, 103) (dual of [(51, 3), 6, 104]-NRT-code), using strength reduction based on linear OOA(2147, 51, F2, 3, 104) (dual of [(51, 3), 6, 105]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(815, 17, F8, 14) (dual of [17, 2, 15]-code), using
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(816, 18, F8, 15) (dual of [18, 2, 16]-code), using
- repeating each code word 2 times [i] based on linear OA(87, 9, F8, 7) (dual of [9, 2, 8]-code or 9-arc in PG(6,8)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(2,8) [i]
- Simplex code S(2,8) [i]
- repeating each code word 2 times [i] based on linear OA(87, 9, F8, 7) (dual of [9, 2, 8]-code or 9-arc in PG(6,8)), using
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(816, 18, F8, 15) (dual of [18, 2, 16]-code), using
- linear OOA(26, 3, F2, 3, 6) (dual of [(3, 3), 3, 7]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(3;3,2) [i]
- linear OA(815, 17, F8, 14) (dual of [17, 2, 15]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.