Information on Result #2657298
Linear OOA(2232, 92, F2, 3, 111) (dual of [(92, 3), 44, 112]-NRT-code), using 2 step truncation based on linear OOA(2234, 93, F2, 3, 113) (dual of [(93, 3), 45, 114]-NRT-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OOA(2234, 93, F2, 3, 114) (dual of [(93, 3), 45, 115]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(3222, 31, F32, 22) (dual of [31, 9, 23]-code or 31-arc in PG(21,32)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3222, 32, F32, 22) (dual of [32, 10, 23]-code or 32-arc in PG(21,32)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(10,32) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3222, 32, F32, 22) (dual of [32, 10, 23]-code or 32-arc in PG(21,32)), using
- linear OOA(24, 3, F2, 3, 4) (dual of [(3, 3), 5, 5]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(3;5,2) [i]
- linear OA(3222, 31, F32, 22) (dual of [31, 9, 23]-code or 31-arc in PG(21,32)), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.