Information on Result #2767594
Linear OOA(2250, 64, F2, 4, 187) (dual of [(64, 4), 6, 188]-NRT-code), using strength reduction based on linear OOA(2250, 64, F2, 4, 188) (dual of [(64, 4), 6, 189]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(86, 8, F8, 6) (dual of [8, 2, 7]-code or 8-arc in PG(5,8)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(2,8) [i]
- linear OOA(229, 8, F2, 4, 26) (dual of [(8, 4), 3, 27]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(29, 3, F2, 4, 9) (dual of [(3, 4), 3, 10]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(4;3,2) [i]
- linear OOA(217, 5, F2, 4, 16) (dual of [(5, 4), 3, 17]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(4;F,3P) [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- linear OOA(29, 3, F2, 4, 9) (dual of [(3, 4), 3, 10]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OA(86, 8, F8, 6) (dual of [8, 2, 7]-code or 8-arc in PG(5,8)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.