Information on Result #2781123
Linear OOA(2193, 48, F2, 4, 169), using 65 step truncation based on linear OOA(2258, 65, F2, 4, 234) (dual of [(65, 4), 2, 235]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 5 times [i] based on linear OOA(250, 13, F2, 4, 46) (dual of [(13, 4), 2, 47]-NRT-code), using
- 8 step truncation [i] based on linear OOA(258, 15, F2, 4, 54) (dual of [(15, 4), 2, 55]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 5 times [i] based on linear OOA(210, 3, F2, 4, 10) (dual of [(3, 4), 2, 11]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(4;2,2) [i]
- repeating each code word 5 times [i] based on linear OOA(210, 3, F2, 4, 10) (dual of [(3, 4), 2, 11]-NRT-code), using
- 8 step truncation [i] based on linear OOA(258, 15, F2, 4, 54) (dual of [(15, 4), 2, 55]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.