Information on Result #2784542
Linear OOA(2250, 83, F2, 4, 99) (dual of [(83, 4), 82, 100]-NRT-code), using 2 step truncation based on linear OOA(2252, 84, F2, 4, 101) (dual of [(84, 4), 84, 102]-NRT-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OOA(2252, 84, F2, 4, 104) (dual of [(84, 4), 84, 105]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6414, 28, F64, 14) (dual of [28, 14, 15]-code or 28-arc in PG(13,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6414, 64, F64, 14) (dual of [64, 50, 15]-code or 64-arc in PG(13,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(50,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6414, 64, F64, 14) (dual of [64, 50, 15]-code or 64-arc in PG(13,64)), using
- linear OOA(26, 3, F2, 4, 6) (dual of [(3, 4), 6, 7]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(4;6,2) [i]
- linear OA(6414, 28, F64, 14) (dual of [28, 14, 15]-code or 28-arc in PG(13,64)), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.