Information on Result #2785750
Linear OOA(3161, 40, F3, 4, 146), using 89 step truncation based on linear OOA(3250, 63, F3, 4, 235) (dual of [(63, 4), 2, 236]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(310, 3, F3, 4, 10) (dual of [(3, 4), 2, 11]-NRT-code), using
- Reed–Solomon NRT-code RS(4;2,3) [i]
- linear OOA(3238, 60, F3, 4, 224) (dual of [(60, 4), 2, 225]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 15 times [i] based on linear OOA(314, 4, F3, 4, 14) (dual of [(4, 4), 2, 15]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(4;2,3) [i]
- repeating each code word 15 times [i] based on linear OOA(314, 4, F3, 4, 14) (dual of [(4, 4), 2, 15]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(310, 3, F3, 4, 10) (dual of [(3, 4), 2, 11]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.