Information on Result #2956938
Linear OOA(293, 13, F2, 7, 85), using 16 step truncation based on linear OOA(2109, 16, F2, 7, 101) (dual of [(16, 7), 3, 102]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(218, 3, F2, 7, 18) (dual of [(3, 7), 3, 19]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(7;3,2) [i]
- linear OOA(288, 13, F2, 7, 82) (dual of [(13, 7), 3, 83]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(218, 3, F2, 7, 18) (dual of [(3, 7), 3, 19]-NRT-code) (see above)
- linear OOA(267, 10, F2, 7, 63) (dual of [(10, 7), 3, 64]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 2 times [i] based on linear OOA(232, 5, F2, 7, 31) (dual of [(5, 7), 3, 32]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(7;F,3P) [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- repeating each code word 2 times [i] based on linear OOA(232, 5, F2, 7, 31) (dual of [(5, 7), 3, 32]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(218, 3, F2, 7, 18) (dual of [(3, 7), 3, 19]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.