Information on Result #2994194
Linear OOA(2163, 20, F2, 8, 152), using 2 step truncation based on linear OOA(2165, 21, F2, 8, 154) (dual of [(21, 8), 3, 155]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(221, 3, F2, 8, 21) (dual of [(3, 8), 3, 22]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(8;3,2) [i]
- linear OOA(2141, 18, F2, 8, 132) (dual of [(18, 8), 3, 133]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(221, 3, F2, 8, 21) (dual of [(3, 8), 3, 22]-NRT-code) (see above)
- linear OOA(2117, 15, F2, 8, 110) (dual of [(15, 8), 3, 111]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 3 times [i] based on linear OOA(237, 5, F2, 8, 36) (dual of [(5, 8), 3, 37]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(8;F,3P) [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- repeating each code word 3 times [i] based on linear OOA(237, 5, F2, 8, 36) (dual of [(5, 8), 3, 37]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(221, 3, F2, 8, 21) (dual of [(3, 8), 3, 22]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.