Information on Result #2994611
Linear OOA(2234, 29, F2, 8, 216), using 19 step truncation based on linear OOA(2253, 32, F2, 8, 235) (dual of [(32, 8), 3, 236]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(221, 3, F2, 8, 21) (dual of [(3, 8), 3, 22]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(8;3,2) [i]
- linear OOA(2229, 29, F2, 8, 213) (dual of [(29, 8), 3, 214]-NRT-code), using
- 8 step truncation [i] based on linear OOA(2237, 30, F2, 8, 221) (dual of [(30, 8), 3, 222]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 6 times [i] based on linear OOA(237, 5, F2, 8, 36) (dual of [(5, 8), 3, 37]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(8;F,3P) [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- repeating each code word 6 times [i] based on linear OOA(237, 5, F2, 8, 36) (dual of [(5, 8), 3, 37]-NRT-code), using
- 8 step truncation [i] based on linear OOA(2237, 30, F2, 8, 221) (dual of [(30, 8), 3, 222]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(221, 3, F2, 8, 21) (dual of [(3, 8), 3, 22]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.