Information on Result #520564
There is no (62, 124, 136)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(2124, 136, S2, 62), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 17949 894855 079503 947693 010542 025773 154304 / 703 > 2124 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (62, 125, 136)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (62, 126, 136)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (62, 127, 136)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (62, 128, 136)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (62, 129, 136)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (62, 130, 136)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (62, 131, 136)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (62, 132, 136)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (62, 133, 136)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 10 | No (62, 134, 136)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 11 | No (62, 135, 136)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 12 | No (62, 136, 136)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 13 | No (62, 137, 136)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 14 | No (62, 138, 136)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 15 | No (62, 139, 136)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||