Information on Result #520641
There is no (85, 177, 183)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(2177, 183, S2, 92), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound shows that M ≥ 6 129982 163463 555433 433388 108601 236734 474956 488734 408704 / 31 > 2177 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (85, 178, 183)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (85, 179, 183)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (85, 180, 183)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (85, 181, 183)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (85, 182, 183)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (85, 183, 183)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (85, 184, 183)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (85, 185, 183)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (85, 186, 183)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 10 | No (85, 187, 183)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 11 | No (85, 188, 183)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 12 | No (85, 189, 183)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 13 | No (85, 190, 183)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||