Information on Result #520791
There is no (107, 213, 226)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(2213, 226, S2, 106), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 309 196888 338883 900145 087329 279256 389288 276000 096012 190642 657030 045696 / 17019 > 2213 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (107, 214, 226)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (107, 215, 226)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (107, 216, 226)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (107, 217, 226)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (107, 218, 226)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (107, 219, 226)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (107, 220, 226)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (107, 221, 226)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (107, 222, 226)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (107, 223, 226)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (107, 224, 226)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (107, 225, 226)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (107, 226, 226)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (107, 227, 226)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (107, 228, 226)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
16 | No (107, 229, 226)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
17 | No (107, 230, 226)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
18 | No (107, 231, 226)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
19 | No (107, 232, 226)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
20 | No (107, 233, 226)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
21 | No (107, 234, 226)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
22 | No (107, 235, 226)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
23 | No (107, 236, 226)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
24 | No (107, 237, 226)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
25 | No (107, 238, 226)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
26 | No (107, 239, 226)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
27 | No (107, 240, 226)-net in base 2 | [i] |