Information on Result #521689

There is no (67, 176, 290)-net in base 3, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(3176, 290, S3, 109), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (67, 177, 290)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction
2No (67, 178, 290)-net in base 3 [i]
3No (67, 179, 290)-net in base 3 [i]
4No (67, 180, 290)-net in base 3 [i]
5No (67, 181, 290)-net in base 3 [i]
6No (67, 182, 290)-net in base 3 [i]
7No (67, 183, 290)-net in base 3 [i]
8No (67, 184, 290)-net in base 3 [i]
9No (67, 185, 290)-net in base 3 [i]
10No (67, 186, 290)-net in base 3 [i]
11No (67, 187, 290)-net in base 3 [i]
12No (67, 188, 290)-net in base 3 [i]
13No (67, 189, 290)-net in base 3 [i]
14No (67, 190, 290)-net in base 3 [i]
15No (67, 191, 290)-net in base 3 [i]
16No (67, 192, 290)-net in base 3 [i]
17No (67, 193, 290)-net in base 3 [i]
18No (67, 194, 290)-net in base 3 [i]
19No (67, 195, 290)-net in base 3 [i]
20No (67, 196, 290)-net in base 3 [i]