Information on Result #521700

There is no (68, 177, 291)-net in base 3, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(3177, 291, S3, 109), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (68, 178, 291)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction
2No (68, 179, 291)-net in base 3 [i]
3No (68, 180, 291)-net in base 3 [i]
4No (68, 181, 291)-net in base 3 [i]
5No (68, 182, 291)-net in base 3 [i]
6No (68, 183, 291)-net in base 3 [i]
7No (68, 184, 291)-net in base 3 [i]
8No (68, 185, 291)-net in base 3 [i]
9No (68, 186, 291)-net in base 3 [i]
10No (68, 187, 291)-net in base 3 [i]
11No (68, 188, 291)-net in base 3 [i]
12No (68, 189, 291)-net in base 3 [i]
13No (68, 190, 291)-net in base 3 [i]
14No (68, 191, 291)-net in base 3 [i]
15No (68, 192, 291)-net in base 3 [i]
16No (68, 193, 291)-net in base 3 [i]
17No (68, 194, 291)-net in base 3 [i]
18No (68, 195, 291)-net in base 3 [i]
19No (68, 196, 291)-net in base 3 [i]
20No (68, 197, 291)-net in base 3 [i]
21No (68, 198, 291)-net in base 3 [i]
22No (68, 199, 291)-net in base 3 [i]
23No (68, 200, 291)-net in base 3 [i]
24No (68, 201, 291)-net in base 3 [i]
25No (68, 202, 291)-net in base 3 [i]
26No (68, 203, 291)-net in base 3 [i]