Information on Result #523041
There is no (12, 81, 92)-net in base 7, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(781, 92, S7, 69), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 864 559770 761790 045338 407853 839994 667208 992212 813032 556141 743602 440684 512083 / 2 553125 > 781 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (12, 82, 92)-net in base 7 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (12, 83, 92)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
3 | No (12, 84, 92)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
4 | No (12, 85, 92)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
5 | No (12, 86, 92)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
6 | No (12, 87, 92)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
7 | No (12, 88, 92)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
8 | No (12, 89, 92)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
9 | No (12, 90, 92)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
10 | No (12, 91, 92)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
11 | No (12, 92, 92)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
12 | No (12, 93, 92)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
13 | No (12, 94, 92)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
14 | No (12, 95, 92)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
15 | No (12, 96, 92)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
16 | No (12, 97, 92)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
17 | No (12, 98, 92)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
18 | No (12, 99, 92)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
19 | No (12, 100, 92)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
20 | No (12, 101, 92)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
21 | No (12, 102, 92)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
22 | No (12, 103, 92)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
23 | No (12, 104, 92)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
24 | No (12, 105, 92)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
25 | No (12, 106, 92)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
26 | No (12, 107, 92)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
27 | No (12, 108, 92)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
28 | No (12, 109, 92)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
29 | No (12, 110, 92)-net in base 7 | [i] |