Information on Result #523782

There is no (16, 126, 144)-net in base 9, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(9126, 144, S9, 110), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (16, 127, 144)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction
2No (16, 128, 144)-net in base 9 [i]
3No (16, 129, 144)-net in base 9 [i]
4No (16, 130, 144)-net in base 9 [i]
5No (16, 131, 144)-net in base 9 [i]
6No (16, 132, 144)-net in base 9 [i]
7No (16, 133, 144)-net in base 9 [i]
8No (16, 134, 144)-net in base 9 [i]
9No (16, 135, 144)-net in base 9 [i]
10No (16, 136, 144)-net in base 9 [i]
11No (16, 137, 144)-net in base 9 [i]
12No (16, 138, 144)-net in base 9 [i]
13No (16, 139, 144)-net in base 9 [i]
14No (16, 140, 144)-net in base 9 [i]
15No (16, 141, 144)-net in base 9 [i]
16No (16, 142, 144)-net in base 9 [i]
17No (16, 143, 144)-net in base 9 [i]
18No (16, 144, 144)-net in base 9 [i]
19No (16, 145, 144)-net in base 9 [i]
20No (16, 146, 144)-net in base 9 [i]
21No (16, 147, 144)-net in base 9 [i]
22No (16, 148, 144)-net in base 9 [i]
23No (16, 149, 144)-net in base 9 [i]
24No (16, 150, 144)-net in base 9 [i]
25No (16, m, 144)-net in base 9 for arbitrarily large m [i]m-Reduction from Arbitrarily Large Net