Information on Result #523789

There is no (18, 123, 298)-net in base 9, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(9123, 298, S9, 105), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (18, 124, 298)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction
2No (18, 125, 298)-net in base 9 [i]
3No (18, 126, 298)-net in base 9 [i]
4No (18, 127, 298)-net in base 9 [i]
5No (18, 128, 298)-net in base 9 [i]
6No (18, 129, 298)-net in base 9 [i]
7No (18, 130, 298)-net in base 9 [i]
8No (18, 131, 298)-net in base 9 [i]
9No (18, 132, 298)-net in base 9 [i]
10No (18, 133, 298)-net in base 9 [i]
11No (18, 134, 298)-net in base 9 [i]
12No (18, 135, 298)-net in base 9 [i]
13No (18, 136, 298)-net in base 9 [i]
14No (18, 137, 298)-net in base 9 [i]
15No (18, 138, 298)-net in base 9 [i]
16No (18, 139, 298)-net in base 9 [i]
17No (18, 140, 298)-net in base 9 [i]
18No (18, 141, 298)-net in base 9 [i]
19No (18, 142, 298)-net in base 9 [i]
20No (18, 143, 298)-net in base 9 [i]
21No (18, 144, 298)-net in base 9 [i]
22No (18, 145, 298)-net in base 9 [i]
23No (18, 146, 298)-net in base 9 [i]
24No (18, 147, 298)-net in base 9 [i]
25No (18, 148, 298)-net in base 9 [i]
26No (18, 149, 298)-net in base 9 [i]
27No (18, 150, 298)-net in base 9 [i]