Information on Result #546331

There is no linear OA(2170, 188, F2, 84) (dual of [188, 18, 85]-code), because residual code would yield OA(286, 103, S2, 42), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(2171, 189, F2, 85) (dual of [189, 18, 86]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OOA(2171, 188, F2, 2, 85) (dual of [(188, 2), 205, 86]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
3No linear OOA(2170, 188, F2, 2, 84) (dual of [(188, 2), 206, 85]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
4No linear OOA(2170, 188, F2, 3, 84) (dual of [(188, 3), 394, 85]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(2170, 188, F2, 4, 84) (dual of [(188, 4), 582, 85]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(2170, 188, F2, 5, 84) (dual of [(188, 5), 770, 85]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(2170, 188, F2, 6, 84) (dual of [(188, 6), 958, 85]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(2170, 188, F2, 7, 84) (dual of [(188, 7), 1146, 85]-NRT-code) [i]
9No linear OOA(2170, 188, F2, 8, 84) (dual of [(188, 8), 1334, 85]-NRT-code) [i]
10No digital (86, 170, 188)-net over F2 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array