Information on Result #546665

There is no linear OA(3150, 174, F3, 99) (dual of [174, 24, 100]-code), because residual code would yield OA(351, 74, S3, 33), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(3151, 175, F3, 100) (dual of [175, 24, 101]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OA(3152, 176, F3, 101) (dual of [176, 24, 102]-code) [i]
3No linear OOA(3151, 174, F3, 2, 100) (dual of [(174, 2), 197, 101]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
4No linear OOA(3152, 174, F3, 2, 101) (dual of [(174, 2), 196, 102]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(3150, 174, F3, 2, 99) (dual of [(174, 2), 198, 100]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
6No linear OOA(3150, 174, F3, 3, 99) (dual of [(174, 3), 372, 100]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(3150, 174, F3, 4, 99) (dual of [(174, 4), 546, 100]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(3150, 174, F3, 5, 99) (dual of [(174, 5), 720, 100]-NRT-code) [i]
9No digital (51, 150, 174)-net over F3 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array