Information on Result #547137

There is no linear OA(4146, 277, F4, 104) (dual of [277, 131, 105]-code), because residual code would yield OA(442, 172, S4, 26), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(4147, 278, F4, 105) (dual of [278, 131, 106]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OA(4148, 279, F4, 106) (dual of [279, 131, 107]-code) [i]
3No linear OA(4149, 280, F4, 107) (dual of [280, 131, 108]-code) [i]
4No linear OOA(4147, 277, F4, 2, 105) (dual of [(277, 2), 407, 106]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
5No linear OOA(4148, 277, F4, 2, 106) (dual of [(277, 2), 406, 107]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(4149, 277, F4, 2, 107) (dual of [(277, 2), 405, 108]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(4146, 277, F4, 2, 104) (dual of [(277, 2), 408, 105]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
8No linear OOA(4146, 277, F4, 3, 104) (dual of [(277, 3), 685, 105]-NRT-code) [i]
9No digital (42, 146, 277)-net over F4 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array