Information on Result #547344

There is no linear OA(4224, 385, F4, 160) (dual of [385, 161, 161]-code), because residual code would yield OA(464, 224, S4, 40), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(4225, 386, F4, 161) (dual of [386, 161, 162]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OA(4226, 387, F4, 162) (dual of [387, 161, 163]-code) [i]
3No linear OA(4227, 388, F4, 163) (dual of [388, 161, 164]-code) [i]
4No linear OOA(4225, 385, F4, 2, 161) (dual of [(385, 2), 545, 162]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
5No linear OOA(4226, 385, F4, 2, 162) (dual of [(385, 2), 544, 163]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(4227, 385, F4, 2, 163) (dual of [(385, 2), 543, 164]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(4224, 385, F4, 2, 160) (dual of [(385, 2), 546, 161]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
8No linear OOA(4224, 385, F4, 3, 160) (dual of [(385, 3), 931, 161]-NRT-code) [i]
9No digital (64, 224, 385)-net over F4 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array