Information on Result #547361

There is no linear OA(4224, 305, F4, 164) (dual of [305, 81, 165]-code), because residual code would yield OA(460, 140, S4, 41), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(4225, 306, F4, 165) (dual of [306, 81, 166]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OA(4226, 307, F4, 166) (dual of [307, 81, 167]-code) [i]
3No linear OA(4227, 308, F4, 167) (dual of [308, 81, 168]-code) [i]
4No linear OOA(4225, 305, F4, 2, 165) (dual of [(305, 2), 385, 166]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
5No linear OOA(4226, 305, F4, 2, 166) (dual of [(305, 2), 384, 167]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(4227, 305, F4, 2, 167) (dual of [(305, 2), 383, 168]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(4224, 305, F4, 2, 164) (dual of [(305, 2), 386, 165]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
8No linear OOA(4224, 305, F4, 3, 164) (dual of [(305, 3), 691, 165]-NRT-code) [i]
9No digital (60, 224, 305)-net over F4 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array